LaHaieHow it works
LaHaie.
Sample Portfolio Intelligence Report
Sample
Understand portfolio structure, risk, diversification, beta, and hedge readiness.
Portfolio Value
₹22,36,613
Total Holdings
47
Best Matching Index
NIFTY 50
Analysis Type
Portfolio Risk & Hedge
Recognition Status
High
Analysis Date
20 Aug 2026
How it works
Three steps to understand your portfolio
No spreadsheets. No jargon. Upload and read.
STEP 01
Upload your holdings
Export your portfolio from Zerodha, Kotak, or Groww and upload the file. LaHaie reads and recognises every holding automatically.
STEP 02
Get your diagnosis
LaHaie computes your Risk Score, Effective Holdings count, Portfolio Beta, sector balance, and Protection Readiness — instantly.
STEP 03
Read your report
Your full Portfolio Intelligence Report is ready to read — like the sample below. No advice given, no data stored beyond your session.
Executive Summary
Portfolio at a glance
Six numbers that define this portfolio’s risk and structure.
Portfolio Value
₹22.4L
Fully recognised · 0 unrecognised
C Grade
Risk Score
45.1/100
Elevated — diversification-driven
Effective Holdings
8
Of 47 raw — hidden concentration
High
Portfolio Beta
1.1
Near-benchmark vs NIFTY
High
Beta Coverage
95%
42 of 47 holdings covered
NIFTY
Hedge Confidence
Medium
Partially ready for simulation
Executive Insight
This portfolio holds 47 recognised holdings valued at ₹22,36,613, supported by high recognition quality. Overall portfolio risk is graded C, primarily influenced by diversification risk — the portfolio behaves like 8 independent positions, not 47. Beta coverage of 95% supports a market-sensitivity analysis at portfolio beta 1.1. Protection readiness is classified as partially ready.
Portfolio Structure
Asset & sector allocation
How capital is distributed across asset classes and sectors.
Asset Allocation
Equity Stocks
66.4%
₹14,85,756
Mutual Funds
22.5%
₹5,03,284
ETFs
11.1%
₹2,47,573
Sector Allocation
METALS · 2 holdings
29.5%
Mutual Fund · 7 holdings
22.5%
AUTOMOBILE · 1 holding
13.7%
ETF · 2 holdings
11.1%
Engg & Cap Goods · 12 holdings
6.9%
Others · 23 holdings
16.4%
Holdings
Top 10 positions
Largest holdings by weight with sector, beta, and coverage status.
HoldingWeightSectorBetaCoverage
HINDALCO
Stocks
27.87%
METALS1.25Fully CoveredLargest
TMPV
Stocks
13.68%
AUTOMOBILE1.35Fully Covered
NIFTYBEES
ETFs
11.05%
ETF1.00Fully Covered
Nippon India Small Cap
Mutual Fund — Direct
6.93%
MF1.25Fully Covered
Mirae Large & Midcap
Mutual Fund — Direct
4.57%
MF0.95Fully Covered
RVNL
Stocks
3.50%
ENGG & CAP GOODS1.20Fully Covered
Axis ELSS Tax Saver
Mutual Fund — Direct
3.16%
MFN/APartial
BANKBARODA
Stocks
2.74%
FIN SERVICES1.35Fully Covered
RCF
Stocks
2.66%
FERTILIZERS0.90Fully Covered
SBI Small Cap Fund
Mutual Fund — Direct
2.42%
MF1.30Fully Covered
Risk Story
Where does portfolio risk come from?
Seven risk dimensions, each computed independently.
C
45.1/100
Risk Grade · Elevated
Primarily driven by Diversification Risk — the portfolio’s effective holdings count (8) drives the elevated score more than single-stock concentration.
Risk Drivers
Diversification Risk10.7 pts
Concentration Risk8.2 pts
Volatility Risk7.0 pts
Liquidity Risk6.0 pts
Beta Risk5.0 pts
Correlation Risk4.0 pts
Sector Risk4.2 pts
Key Takeaway
Portfolio risk is graded C, driven primarily by limited diversification. Despite 47 holdings, the portfolio behaves like 8 effective positions.
Beta Intelligence
Market sensitivity
How does this portfolio move relative to the NIFTY benchmark?
Portfolio Beta
1.1
Near benchmark
Beta Coverage
95%
42 of 47 holdings
Benchmark
NIFTY
Best match
Confidence
Med
Data quality
Value with beta support₹21,17,690 of ₹22,36,613
A beta of 1.1 means this portfolio has historically moved ~10% more than NIFTY in both directions. If NIFTY falls 10%, this portfolio has typically fallen ~11%. Five holdings (₹1,18,923) are excluded from beta calculation due to insufficient price history.
Protection Readiness
Is this portfolio structurally suitable for hedging?
Six readiness dimensions, each measured independently.
Readiness
Partially Ready
High recognition quality (100%) and 95% beta coverage are strong foundations. Best hedge instrument: NIFTY 50. Hedgeable exposure: 77% of portfolio value. Scenario result is unavailable — one or more payoff inputs are incomplete.
Recognition Readiness
High · High confidence
All 47 holdings were successfully parsed and confirmed.
Beta Readiness
High · Medium confidence
95% of portfolio value has usable historical beta data.
~
Hedge-Index Match
Partially Ready · Medium
NIFTY 50 matches portfolio composition at medium confidence.
Data Quality
Not Available
Overall market-intelligence data completeness not fully scored.
Contract Sizing Viability
Not Available
Hedge contract size vs desired coverage not yet determined.
!
Scenario Completeness
Incomplete
One or more payoff inputs are missing; economic result unavailable.
Assessment
Strengths and watch areas
Strengths
  • High recognition quality — all 47 holdings confirmed and usable across every readiness dimension.
  • Broad beta coverage (95%) — market-sensitivity analysis reflects nearly the full portfolio.
  • ETF allocation (11.1%) — NIFTYBEES provides the strongest single risk-mitigation element.
Watch Areas
  • 47 raw holdings → 8 effective — hidden concentration despite the large holding count.
  • HINDALCO at 27.87% — single largest holding, concentrated in Metals sector.
  • Diversification Risk (10.7 pts) is the largest contributor to the Risk Score.
Portfolio Intelligence · Free for BBS investors
Your portfolio has a story.
Do you know what it says?
Upload your holdings from Zerodha, Kotak, or Groww and get your own Portfolio Intelligence Report — Risk Score, Effective Holdings, Portfolio Beta, and Protection Readiness in one place.
Learn about portfolio risk
No data is stored beyond your session. LaHaie is a diagnostic tool, not investment advice.
Disclaimer: This is a sample report based on an anonymised portfolio. LaHaie is a simulation and portfolio intelligence tool — not investment advice, a trade recommendation, or execution validation. All outputs are based on user-uploaded data and user-declared assumptions. Past portfolio structure does not predict future performance. Simulated outcomes are illustrative. Missing data is shown as unavailable and is never replaced with assumptions.